One identity platform for humans, workloads, and AI agents.
SecNiva builds a single identity layer that sits across the tools you already run — your identity provider, your privileged-access tooling, your cloud platforms — and gives every actor, human or machine, the same four-step treatment: known, issued, authorized, proven.
Four steps, applied to every actor in your environment.
Discover
What actually has access right now?
Every human, device, workload, and agent identity touching your systems, mapped to the standing credentials behind them and ranked by blast radius. The inventory nobody has when the audit lands.
Issue
Where does a credential come from?
Credentials issued on demand, per workload, that expire on their own — replacing the static keys and standing service accounts that never do. This is the step that removes the risk rather than monitoring it.
Authorize
What is this allowed to do?
Policy decides scope per action, before access is granted, using the same model whether the requester is an employee, a service, or an autonomous agent. Written as code, versioned, reviewable.
Prove
Can you show it to a regulator?
A signed, retained record of every decision — who or what asked, what was granted, for how long, and what they did with it. Evidence, not log volume.
An AI agent is a workload that acts on its own. Treat it like one.
Most identity infrastructure was designed around a person at a keyboard, then stretched to cover servers. Agents break the stretch: they appear in seconds, call systems no one mapped, act without a human in the loop, and disappear before anyone reviews what happened. SecNiva designs the identity layer for that case first — then applies the same model back across your workloads and your people, which is where it should have been all along.
Named, not shared
Every agent gets its own identity, so an action can be traced to one agent instead of one key that forty things use.
Scoped per action
An agent authorized to issue a refund cannot read the customer table. Scope is a policy decision, evaluated per call.
Expiring by default
Credentials measured in minutes. A leaked one is worthless before anyone can use it.
Provable after the fact
A signed record of what each agent was allowed to do and what it actually did — the answer to the board question you're going to get.
You don't have to replace your identity stack to fix this.
Every vendor in this market wants a rip-and-replace. That's not how identity infrastructure actually gets fixed in a company that has to keep running. SecNiva works in stages — each one is a shippable engagement with its own outcome, so you can fund the next stage on the evidence of the last one instead of on a five-year promise.
Your identity provider stays
Okta, Entra, Ping — whatever you run for workforce sign-on keeps running. We build the layer it never covered: workloads and agents.
Nothing is cut over at once
Stage 2 starts with the highest-risk service tier, not the whole estate. The blast radius closes first; the long tail follows.
You can stop at any stage
Every stage leaves you better off standing still than you were. There is no half-finished state that requires the next engagement to be worth anything.
The four things every serious buyer asks.
We already have an identity provider. Isn't this duplicated?
Your identity provider handles people signing in. It was never designed to issue identity to a service that starts and stops in seconds, or an agent that calls an API on its own. That layer is missing in most enterprises, and it's the layer we build — alongside what you already run, not instead of it.
Can't we buy a product for this?
You can buy tools that detect the problem, and gateways that sit in front of some of it. What no product does is decide what an identity means in your environment, what scope each workload should have, and how to migrate hundreds of services onto it without an outage. That's an engineering project, and it's the part that's actually hard.
How long before we see anything?
Stage 1 — a complete inventory of what has access and what it would cost you — is weeks, not quarters, and it stands on its own as a board deliverable. You'll know your real exposure before you commit to changing anything.
What happens when the engagement ends?
You own the architecture, the infrastructure code, and the runbooks. Everything is built on open, vendor-neutral standards specifically so there's no dependency on SecNiva to keep it running. That's a design constraint, not a courtesy.
Find out which stage you’re actually at.
Thirty minutes, your environment specifically, and a straight answer about where the real exposure is.
Book a 30-minute session